HYDERABAD: The Telangana High Court emphasized the pressing need for a comprehensive approach to resolving disputes surrounding full tank level (FTL), buffer zones, and canals throughout the state. The court insisted that all pending petitions be addressed in a unified manner, and any necessary land acquisition should strictly adhere to government directives.
The court expressed dissatisfaction over the years of delays, questioning the effectiveness of officials who allowed these issues to persist unaddressed. It highlighted the contradictory situation where revenue authorities issue land ownership documents while irrigation officials designate the same parcels as water flow paths, FTL, or buffer zones.
These remarks were made during a hearing regarding a petition contesting the irrigation department’s decision to demolish the Jawaharnagar compound wall. The petitioner argued that authorities were redirecting drainage and sewage onto his property.
Justice B Vijayasen Reddy denied the request for interim relief to stop the demolition, noting that local residents supported the wall’s removal to prevent waterlogging. The court advised the petitioner to voice his concerns to the relevant authorities and instructed officials to submit a counter. The case has been adjourned to September 9.
‘Worsening Parking Crisis in Hyderabad’
In a separate issue, Justice Vijayasen Reddy voiced significant concerns regarding the escalating parking crisis in Hyderabad. He criticized builders for adding extra flats without securing adequate parking spaces, exacerbating traffic congestion across the city.
While addressing a parking dispute in Rajendranagar, he noted that builders frequently receive approval for 10 flats with designated parking, only to illegally construct four additional units without providing any parking. “Homebuyers should only purchase flats after confirming proper parking availability,” stated Justice Reddy.
He highlighted that the lack of planned parking solutions is forcing vehicles onto public roads, worsening traffic issues. Notices were issued to the opposing parties, including local authorities and the petitioner’s neighbors. The case is set for further discussion on September 2.
