Tag: Supreme Court order

Latest StoriesRegulatory

Noida Authority Issues Conditional OC to Sports City After SC Order

NOIDA: During its board meeting on Saturday, the Noida Authority issued a conditional occupancy certificate for the long-delayed Sports City project in Sector 150. This decision comes after the Supreme Court’s order from November 24, which approved a framework for reviving the Sports City SC-02 project developed by Lotus Green Constructions. The ruling enables construction to resume after nearly three years, offering a reprieve for approximately 20,000 homebuyers waiting for possession or registration of their properties. The Supreme Court mandated that the Noida Authority lift the ban placed on the developer in January 2021 within 30–45 days. Lotus Green plans…

CommercialLatest Stories

Illegal Commercial Complex Torn Down in Meerut’s Residential Area

Representative Image MEERUT: Following a Supreme Court directive, the Uttar Pradesh Housing Development Board took action to demolish an unauthorized commercial building located on a residential site in Meerut on Saturday. The structure was situated in the Central Market area of Shastri Nagar. “The demolition took approximately five hours, and most of the structure has been removed. The building is currently sealed, and efforts will continue on Sunday morning,” stated Rajiv Kumar, Superintendent Engineer of the Uttar Pradesh Awas Vikas Parishad, to PTI. He also mentioned that there has been no pushback from those involved. On December 17, 2024, the…

Latest StoriesRegulatory

Delhi HC denies extension for Signature View apartment vacate

NEW DELHI: Residents of Signature View Apartments made a last-ditch effort to prolong their vacate deadline, but the Delhi High Court rejected their plea on Tuesday, stating, “We will not put our seal at your risk.” A bench consisting of Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedella noted the Supreme Court had previously identified the buildings as dilapidated. “In light of the Supreme Court’s order from October 10, we cannot grant any time extension,” the bench stated, dismissing the appeal from nine residents who sought a grace period under the court’s “mercy” jurisdiction. “If we grant more time…