Tag: Bombay High Court

Latest StoriesRegulatory

HC: Goa Government Lacks Accountability on Illegal Constructions

PANAJI: On Monday, the Bombay High Court criticized the Goa government for its lack of accountability while addressing a petition regarding the enforcement of demolition orders for structures on Birch by Romeo Lane. A division bench, consisting of Justices Sarang Kotwal and Ashish Chavan, posed critical inquiries that have been on the public’s mind since the tragic incident. “Given there was a demolition order, why was a trade license granted in the first place?” they questioned, noting that it was “very problematic” that the demolition order had remained pending for an extended period at the director of panchayats. They inquired…

Latest StoriesRegulatory

Bombay HC Nullifies ₹600 Crore Bandra Bungalow Probate

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court has annulled a probate granted eight years ago concerning the landmark ‘Marina Manor’ bungalow in Bandra, valued at over Rs 600 crore. The court determined that the probate was secured through the concealment of important facts and false statements regarding the deceased’s family. This ruling, issued on December 11 by Justice Sharmila U Deshmukh, followed a petition filed under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act. The court revoked the probate initially granted in November 2017 to Marina Manuel Fernandes for a will dated November 8, 2014, allegedly belonging to Marie Joseph Fernandes, who died…

Latest StoriesRegulatory

Bombay HC Questions Police Protection for Parth Pawar in Land Deal

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Wednesday raised significant concerns about the police investigation into a controversial land deal in Pune, hinting that authorities may be protecting Parth Pawar, son of Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar, by leaving him out of the FIR. A single judge bench led by Justice Madhav Jamdar questioned the prosecution while considering the pre-arrest bail application of businesswoman Sheetal Tejwani, one of the accused in the case. Justice Jamdar pointed out that Parth Pawar, a major stakeholder in the involved firm, was not mentioned in the FIR, directly asking, “Is the police shielding the son…

Latest StoriesRegulatory

Bombay HC Dismisses WeWork India IPO Challenge, Imposes ₹1 Lakh Fee

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court has dismissed two writ petitions filed by Vinay Bansal and Hemant Kulshrestha that aimed to prevent WeWork India’s initial public offering (IPO), effectively ending their last-minute legal challenge. A Division Bench consisting of Justice RI Chagla and Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash rejected the petitions and imposed a cost of Rs 1 lakh on Vinay Bansal, instructing him to deposit the amount with the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority within two weeks. The court reserved its decision on October 8 after the arguments were concluded and delivered the ruling orally today. A detailed written judgment is…

Latest StoriesRera

MahaRERA Releases SOP to Speed Up Compensation Recovery

PUNE: The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has introduced a detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) to streamline the process of obtaining compensation from developers who disregard its orders. Released on Thursday, in response to directives from the Bombay High Court, the SOP outlines strict timelines and escalation measures, which may include property attachment and civil imprisonment, as noted by MahaRERA officials. According to senior MahaRERA officials speaking to TOI, the new SOP is designed to “ensure strict compliance with the high court’s ruling and offer timely relief to homebuyers.” Developers are now required to compensate affected homebuyers within 60…

IndustryLatest Stories

Mumbai: MHADA Lawyer’s Role in Girgaum Redevelopment Delay

MUMBAI: A confidential report from MHADA’s legal department has confirmed that the critical Section 79A notice issued to Parekh Estate Pvt Ltd has never been revoked. This contradicts earlier claims made by MHADA panel advocate Priyanka Chavan during a writ petition in front of the Bombay High Court this year. According to an internal memo dated November 14, 2025, “the 79A notice issued to the landlord…has not been revoked by this office.” It further indicates that there are no documents reflecting any revocation and that the matter falls under the jurisdiction of the Dy. Chief Engineer (Zone II), not the…

Latest StoriesRegulatory

Bombay HC Postpones Builder’s Bail Hearing to November 27

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court has postponed the hearing for pre-arrest bail filed by builder Bhavesh Sanghrajka to November 27. This plea is related to an FIR alleging culpable homicide not amounting to murder, following the death of a 22-year-old woman caused by a cement block that fell from his construction site in Jogeshwari. The prosecutor informed the court that no action will be taken until the next hearing. Justice N R Borkar remarked that additional public prosecutor BV Holambe-Patil is requesting more time to present a report from an expert regarding the safety measures taken at the site. Sanghrajka,…

Latest StoriesRegulatory

Bombay HC Rejects PILs Against Sancoale Real Estate Project

Representative image. PANAJI: The Bombay High Court dismissed two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed by villagers from Sancoale and Goa Bachao Abhiyan challenging the real estate project ‘Acqua Eden’, developed by M/s Parmesh Construction Co. Ltd. (Bhutani Infra) in Sancoale. The division bench, comprising Justices Bharati Dangre and Nivedita Mehta, noted that the PILs were rejected, with detailed reasons to be provided in a forthcoming order. The petitioners raised significant concerns regarding serious illegalities and environmental violations, seeking to annul the clearances and licenses related to the project located in an eco-sensitive region. They claimed that the permissions were obtained…

Latest StoriesRegulatory

Bombay HC Cancels NOC for Filmmaker to Merge Flats in Oshiwara

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court has annulled an order from the deputy registrar of cooperative societies for the K-West ward, which had instructed a housing society in Oshiwara, Andheri West, to approve film producer and director Vipul Shah’s request to merge four flats across two floors. Justice Amit Borkar stated on Monday that the decision exceeded the authority outlined in the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, asserting that such power cannot be exercised. The Oberoi Springs CHSL contested the deputy registrar’s ruling under sub-clause 3 of Section 154B-27, which pertains to the society’s obligation to act and the registrar’s enforcement…

Latest StoriesRegulatory

Bombay HC Bars Developer from Adding to Tardeo Twin Towers

MUMBAI: In a significant legal dispute, the Bombay High Court issued an interim ruling on Tuesday, preventing developer S D Corporation from making any changes to the 60-storey twin towers known as ‘The Imperial’ in Tardeo. A group of 48 residents from Towers A and B took legal action against the developer for attempting to construct additional buildings and flats, which they argued violated a 2009 building plan previously presented to them. On Tuesday, the High Court prohibited any alterations without the residents’ consent. The court expressed that the developer’s intention to construct further, utilizing a substantial sale component of…