GURUGRAM: The District Town Planner (Enforcement) has begun action against Sewa Corporate Park on MG Road for illegally subdividing the commercial complex into multiple units and selling them to third parties without the necessary license required by the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas (HDR) Act, 1975.
Officials report that while the project was granted change of land use permission in 2004 and received an occupation certificate in 2009, it was later divided into various shops and offices without proper approval.
This action follows a Punjab and Haryana High Court order dated September 8, 2025, concerning a writ petition by the Sewa Corporate Park Condominium Association. The petition addressed the developer’s alleged lack of a completion certificate and a deed of declaration for the project.
As per DTCP records, change of land use (CLU) permission was issued in January 2004 for the construction of a departmental store, restaurant, banquet hall, shopping center, and office complex over 6,480.76 square yards in Sarhaul village, excluding land in the restricted zone along the Gurgaon-Mehrauli Road. An occupation certificate for the site was issued in April 2009.
However, officials indicated that the subsequent subdivision and sale of units were executed without the requisite licensing from the relevant authority, rendering the development unauthorized. In response, the enforcement wing has initiated legal proceedings under Section 10 of the HDR Act and issued a show-cause notice on December 8, 2025. Further legal actions will be taken as warranted.
The DTCP has also contacted the relevant sub-registrar to halt any further sale deeds in the complex until a resolution is reached. The department is in the process of obtaining copies of previously executed sale deeds to evaluate the extent of violations.
Additionally, the DTCP stated that since the site falls within the jurisdiction of the Municipal Corporation of Gurgaon, the civic body may also pursue actions for breaches of CLU conditions under applicable municipal laws.
This case underscores ongoing concerns regarding unauthorized commercial developments in key city areas and highlights the necessity for stronger enforcement to protect buyers’ interests and ensure planned urban growth.
